Cost savings associated with the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, instream flows, and prospects for the future
(eBook)
Author
Contributors
Published
Fort Collins, CO : Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 2010.
Physical Desc
1 online resource (32 pages) : illustration, map
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
More Copies In Prospector
Loading Prospector Copies...
More Details
Format
eBook
Language
English
Notes
General Note
"November 15, 2010."
General Note
"Funding for this study was provided by the Colorado Water Conservation Board and Environmental Defense Fund."
Bibliography
Bibliography: pages 29-32.
Description
This report investigates the role of instream flows as part of a program to protect and recover certain water-dependent endangered species. For the purposes of this report, instream flows are defined as non-consumptive, in-channel flows of water. We examined two case studies of endangered fish species programs that included instream flows, one on the upper Colorado River and one on the San Juan River. Cost savings with cooperative recovery programs are calculated. Scenarios involving increased instream flows are evaluated to estimate what the cost savings might be to water developers from additional instream flow appropriations and acquisitions by the Colorado Water Conservation Board.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Loomis, J. B., & Ballweber, J. A. (2010). Cost savings associated with the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, instream flows, and prospects for the future . Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Loomis, John B and Jeffery A. Ballweber. 2010. Cost Savings Associated With the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Instream Flows, and Prospects for the Future. Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Loomis, John B and Jeffery A. Ballweber. Cost Savings Associated With the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Instream Flows, and Prospects for the Future Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 2010.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Loomis, John B., and Jeffery A Ballweber. Cost Savings Associated With the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Instream Flows, and Prospects for the Future Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 2010.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
20eee5e7-2d14-4a78-d7db-01460ee32ffe-eng
Grouping Information
| Grouped Work ID | 20eee5e7-2d14-4a78-d7db-01460ee32ffe-eng |
|---|---|
| Full title | cost savings associated with the upper colorado river basin endangered fish recovery program instream flows and prospects for the future |
| Author | loomis john b |
| Grouping Category | book |
| Last Update | 2022-06-13 10:33:16AM |
| Last Indexed | 2024-05-04 00:07:18AM |
Book Cover Information
| Image Source | default |
|---|---|
| First Loaded | Sep 7, 2022 |
| Last Used | Apr 28, 2024 |
Marc Record
| First Detected | Sep 24, 2015 12:00:00 AM |
|---|---|
| Last File Modification Time | Jul 31, 2021 04:35:41 AM |
MARC Record
| LEADER | 02926nam a2200505Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ocn922011564 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20150924024859.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d s | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 150924s2010 couab ob s000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)922011564 | ||
| 040 | |a DDB|b eng|e rda|c DDB|d UtOrBLW | ||
| 043 | |a n-us-co | ||
| 049 | |a DDBA | ||
| 086 | |a UCSU5/2.2/C82/2010/INTERNET | ||
| 086 | |a UCSU5/2.2/C82/2010/INTERNET|2 codocs | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Loomis, John B. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cost savings associated with the Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program, instream flows, and prospects for the future|h [electronic resource] /|c John Loomis and Jeff Ballweber. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Fort Collins, CO :|b Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University,|c 2010. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (32 pages) :|b illustration, map | ||
| 336 | |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent | ||
| 336 | |a still image|b sti|2 rdacontent | ||
| 336 | |a cartographic image|b cri|2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a "November 15, 2010." | ||
| 500 | |a "Funding for this study was provided by the Colorado Water Conservation Board and Environmental Defense Fund." | ||
| 504 | |a Bibliography: pages 29-32. | ||
| 520 | |a This report investigates the role of instream flows as part of a program to protect and recover certain water-dependent endangered species. For the purposes of this report, instream flows are defined as non-consumptive, in-channel flows of water. We examined two case studies of endangered fish species programs that included instream flows, one on the upper Colorado River and one on the San Juan River. Cost savings with cooperative recovery programs are calculated. Scenarios involving increased instream flows are evaluated to estimate what the cost savings might be to water developers from additional instream flow appropriations and acquisitions by the Colorado Water Conservation Board. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page, viewed September 2015. | |
| 610 | 2 | 0 | |a Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. |
| 650 | 0 | |a Endangered species|z Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ballweber, Jeffery A. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Colorado State University.|b Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Colorado Water Conservation Board. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Environmental Defense Fund. | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://hdl.handle.net/11629/co:20716_ucsu522c822010internet.pdf|z Access online |
| 907 | |a .b10603712|b 10-24-20|c 09-24-15 | ||
| 945 | |g 1|j 0|l csdig|o -|p $0.00|q -|r -|s j |t 0|u 0|v 0|w 0|x 0|y .i11602855|z 09-24-15 | ||
| 994 | |a C0|b DDB | ||
| 998 | |a cs|b 09-24-15|c m|d a |e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 0 | ||
| 998 | |a cs|b 09-24-15|c m|d a |e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 0 | ||
| 998 | |a cs|b 09-24-15|c m|d a|e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 0 | ||
| 998 | |a cs|b 09-24-15|c m|d a|e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 1 | ||
.png)